Nuclear energy is commonly offered as an alternative to overcome the crisis of
energy. The
debate of whether the use of nuclear energy is an appropriate choice has not come to an end. Some
people agree with the utilization of it because of its benefits. Some others,
however, disagree because of its risks to the environment.
Those who agree with the operation of
nuclear reactors usually argue that nuclear energy is the only feasible choice to answer the ever-increasing energy
needs. In their opinion, the other sources of energy: oil, coal, and liquid natural gas are not renewable and safe, while nuclear
energy can be sustainably when produced in a safe way.
However, people who disagree with the use
of nuclear energy point out that the waste of nuclear products can completely destroy the
environment and human lives. A meltdown in a reactor, for example,
usually results in the contamination of the surrounding soil and water. Take for
example, the blow up of the nuclear reactor at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power
Station in Russia twenty years ago. The serious contamination imperiled people and the
environment severely.
It is obvious that nuclear energy should be
avoided because it really endangers the environment but what about a less polluted energy instead of nuclear energy? Are there any
alternative energies to overcome the crisis of energy?
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar